Whether the dismissal of the appeal violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994) this Court has not hesitated to find proceedings violative of due process where a party has been deprived of a well-established common-law protection against arbitrary and inaccurate adjudication. This Court recognizes that the access to court is a fundamental right to Due Process and liberty within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause, but it is declined to Defendant to recall remittitur and reinstate the appeal, which is dismissed by application of the controversial and broadly defined Statutory Law of Vexatious Litigant. In State Tax Comm'n v. Van Cott, 306 U.S. 511 (1939) "We have frequently held that, in the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction, we have power not only to correct error in the judgment under review, but to make such disposition of the case as justice requires. In this : Court supervisory power is to review and recall Remittitur to protect Petitioner’s right to Due Process. —_¢