No. 19-7824
Dexter Fisher v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 924(c) categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-procedure firearm-brandishing hobbs-act section-924c sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Fisher's § 924(c) convictions for brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence must be vacated because the Hobbs Act robbery offenses underlying the § 924(c) convictions categorically fail to qualify as crimes of violence within the meaning of § 924(c)(3)(A)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Mr. Fisher’s § 924(c) convictions for brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence must be vacated because the Hobbs Act robbery offenses underlying the § 924(c) convictions categorically fail to qualify as crimes of violence within the meaning of § 924(c)(3)(A)? ii
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Dexter Fisher
Johanna Maria Christiansen — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Johanna Maria Christiansen — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent