Tajuddin Salahuddin v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
When the United States of America seizes innocent third-party property and cash; applies 21 U.S.C 853 to forfeit the property but applies a separate restitution type lien under 18 U.S.C 3613(c) to cash to prevent any intervention by a third party, what equivalent procedure and opportunity does the innocent third-party have to contest its cash being applied to a criminal defendant's restitution?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) When the United States of America seizes innocent third-party property and cash; applies 21 U.S.C 853 to forfeit the property but applies a separate restitution type lien under 18 U.S.C 3613(c) to cash to prevent any intervention by a third party, what equivalent procedure and opportunity does the innocent third-party have to contest its cash being applied to a criminal defendant's restitution? 1) Whether Petitioner’s loan agreement establishes his security interest and priority over United States restitution lien on cash seized from a criminal Defendant under Texas law? ii