No. 19-7839
Christopher Sanchez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure deterrence due-process imprisonment plain-error-review policy-statement policy-statement-range sentencing sentencing-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a single-sentence explanation of 'I believe this addresses the issues of adequate deterrence and protection of the public' procedurally reasonable on plain error review when the district court imposes a sentence of imprisonment above the policy-statement range?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Is a single-sentence explanation of “I believe this addresses the issues of adequate deterrence and protection of the public” procedurally reasonable on plain error review when the district court imposes a sentence of imprisonment above the policy-statement range? i
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-02-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Christopher Sanchez
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent