Whether agency expertise could be applied to threshold questions accompanying a constitutional claim against a federal statute

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘1 When considering whether agency expertise could be brought to bear on the questions presented in the “Bennett” decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit said “that sess could apply their expertise to threshold questions that may accompany a constitutional claim against a federal statute”, and; , a) Winether the (“PLRA”) determination for [“Jmminent Danger”] permit by laws, or (“Promoting Injustice”, based upon the determination of the evidence on the records or [“injuries df. facts? or [victim of crimes”] and [‘retaliation”], [“adverse action”] and violated the due process clause of the constitutions. warthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219, 131 S. Ct. 859, 178 L. b) The question is pending in this court for the evaluation of the evidence and declaring that the. (“PLRA”) contains [“ambiguities”] that is conflicting with the (“INA”) under section 101 (a) (15) ©) Gi), and; a) Whether or not the word “[Alien”] is the proximate cause of the exclusion from the COLA’: or the question is pending in this court to evaluate the word if it refer to [“Negro”], [“Anima?’], [“follower”], [Serious criminal] and it promoting [“inferiority” Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 500 U.S. 614, 619, 111 S. Ct. 2077, 114 L. Ed. 2d 660 (1991) | ve Be .