No. 19-7852
Edwin F. Parson v. United States Air Force, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure-abuse-of-discretion-standing-fede civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction federal-statutes judicial-process legal-review remedy scotus-petition standing supreme-court
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is an absence of a remedy when a federal magistrate judge acknowledges there is a civil right that has been violated
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED EAsy Peasy Lemov squeze/ © Wy AFTER bh ReureEW oF ReLATED CouRT DeumenTs Heke rs AN Absence oF A Remedy EN Thos! A PeDeeAL MAGESTLaTe CHW ALNOWLEPGE THERE rs A couEl RIodT THAT Feed At Raves 7 | ES THRE f STRATAGEM. OF SUBTER Fuge To Hwe WhReE Hele rs A Rew THERE rs 4 Benep"@ peccoeD GY SCOTUS AS oPPosED TO A DeEzsrew | EN A poweR CorRT WHEN Zr Comes TO marTees OF UNETED SA7es ULOL TENG, FEDCRAL SUrures 7
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent USAF, et al. to respond filed.
2020-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2020)
Attorneys
USAF, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent