No. 19-7854
Howronda Overstreet v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure Did Ms. Overstreet's waiver of appeal unenforceabl Did the district court commit plain error when it due-process guidelines guidelines-calculation plain-error plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines waiver
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION 1: DID MS. OVERSTREET PRESERVE HER RIGHT TO
APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT'S INAPPLICABLE
GUIDELINES CALCULATION ?
QUESTION 2: WAS MS. OVERSTREET'S WAIVER OF APPEAL
UNENFORCEABLE BECAUSE IT WAS ENTERED
UNKNOWINGLY AND INVOLUNTARILY ?
QUESTION 3: DID THE DISTRICT COURT COMMIT PLAIN ERROR
WHEN IT IMPOSED A SENTENCE THAT EXCEEDED THE
APPLICABLE GUIDELINE RANGE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Ms. Overstreet preserve her right to appeal the district court's inapplicable guidelines calculation?
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Howronda Overstreet
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent