No. 19-7872
Samuel A. Wilder v. William F. Krebs
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process fourth-circuit informal-brief motion-to-extend pro-se pro-se-litigation procedural-ripeness standing waiver-doctrine
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court should have assisted this pro se litigant with time to respond to the Defendant's motion to extend time and Defendant's response to the informal brief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED l. Whether the court should have assist this prose litigate with ' time to respond to the Defendant's motion to extend time and Defendant's response to the informal brief? 2. Whether this case is ripe for a remand to the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit to respond to Defendant's motion to extend time and Defendant's response to the informal brief. é z ortei heir affirmative 3; Whether Refendant waived or forteiture, their. affizpatixe defense.
Docket Entries
2020-09-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-06-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-17
Reply of petitioner Samuel A. Wilder filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-04
Brief of respondent William F. Krebs in opposition filed.
2020-04-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2020.
2020-04-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2020 to May 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
Attorneys
William F. Krebs
Jack G. Gresh — Hall Booth Smith, P.C., Respondent
Jack G. Gresh — Hall Booth Smith, P.C., Respondent