No. 19-7875
Byron Gay v. Scott Daffenbach, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-procedure dna-testing evidence evidentiary-rules judicial-admission judicial-admissions legal-standards scientific-evidence standards
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED: , 1. | THEUNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS NOT ESTABLISHED IN THE FEDERAL COURTS OR THE STATE COURTS ANY CASE "LAW INSTRUCTING JUDGES THAT THEY MUST EMPHASIZE: TO . CONSTITUTE A JUDICIAL ADMISSION THE STATEMENT MUST BE TAKEN IN CONTEXT. IT MUST BE DELIBERATE, DECLARATORY IN NATURE, . CLEAR, AND FORMAL DISPENSING WITH PROOF OF FACTS. 2. | HAS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DETERMINED WHAT AMOUNT OF TEMPLATE DNA IS NEEDED TO RECEIVE RELIABLE . RESULTS CONSISTENT AND, ACCEPTABLE IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY DURING TESTING? 2
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Daffenbach to respond filed.
2019-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)
2019-08-16
Application (19A176) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 12, 2019.
2019-07-30
Application (19A176) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 13, 2019 to December 12, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Scott Daffenbach
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent