Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protection of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida (“the Third DCA”) violated the due process protection of the 5" and 14% Amendment to the U. S. Constitution by allowing the respondent AMERIPORT, LTD., ET AL. Rule 9.100 failure to resolve the issue of when a motion for rehearing is filed timely in the wrong court, it must be treated as timely filed. Recently, several courts have found that when a document is filed in the wrong court and the document is transferred to the proper court, the date of filing is the date the document was filed in the wrong court, not the date it was received by the proper court. As long as the Petitioner conforms to the rules adopted by the court in seeking a motion for rehearing, they should not lose their opportunity to present what may be meritorious claims for relief simply because they have either sought the wrong form of relief or have sought the proper relief in the wrong court. even though it was filed in the wrong circuit court in which it has jurisdiction. Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protection of the 5" and 14‘ amendments to the U.S. Constitution by refusing to grant disqualification when there are objective . _ Teasons to question its impartiality in foreclosure appeals raising this same fraudulent misconduct?