No. 19-7889
Walter Rosario-Colon v. Louisiana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-conviction criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence insufficient-evidence jury-instructions reasonable-jurist second-degree-murder self-defense
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurists would determine that Walter Rosario-Colon acted in self-defense when he struck Antonio Aguado, or whether there was insufficient evidence to prove that Mr. Rosario-Colon is guilty of Second Degree Murder
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Reasonable jurists would determine that Walter Rosario-Colon acted in self-defense when he struck Antonio Aguado. In the alternative, there was Insufficient evidence to prove that Mr. Rosario-Colon is guilty of Second Degree Murder.
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2020-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Walter Rosario-Colon
Walter Rosario-Colon — Petitioner