No. 19-7890

Kevin Michael-Ferdinand Richards v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2020-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion coercion constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance effective-assistance-of-counsel plea-coercion plea-understanding plea-withdrawal trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-05-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did The Trial Court Abuse Its Discretion When It Denied Plea Withdrawal Under MCR 6.310(B)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | | | a 3 LL , Did The Trial Court Abose Its Discretion When Tt Denied | . : . Pea Withdrawal Under MCR -3|0(8)§ Mr. Rictaeds Has | : A Due Process Righ' To Plen Withdrawal Where He Was ft . Denied His Rig TO The Effective Assistance OF Coonsel, | The Plea Was Not Understanding, And the PleaWas a | 7 Trial Court (presonadly) answered, “NO”. | : Oo Court oF Appeals answered, ‘ND’. 7 a Sopree Coot answered, ‘NAL. ot rt De Fendant-Appellant answers, "Yes", . | | TL, Does Mr Rictards Have A Due Procoss Right Te Plea | i Withdrawal When He Was Denied His Rignt To THe. i . EF Eesti ve Assistance OF Counsel, THe Plea Was Nat : Understandings And The Plea Was Coe cea! | :

Docket Entries

2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Richards Kevin Michael-Ferdinand
Kevin Richards — Petitioner