Kevin Michael-Ferdinand Richards v. Michigan
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Did The Trial Court Abuse Its Discretion When It Denied Plea Withdrawal Under MCR 6.310(B)?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | | | a 3 LL , Did The Trial Court Abose Its Discretion When Tt Denied | . : . Pea Withdrawal Under MCR -3|0(8)§ Mr. Rictaeds Has | : A Due Process Righ' To Plen Withdrawal Where He Was ft . Denied His Rig TO The Effective Assistance OF Coonsel, | The Plea Was Not Understanding, And the PleaWas a | 7 Trial Court (presonadly) answered, “NO”. | : Oo Court oF Appeals answered, ‘ND’. 7 a Sopree Coot answered, ‘NAL. ot rt De Fendant-Appellant answers, "Yes", . | | TL, Does Mr Rictards Have A Due Procoss Right Te Plea | i Withdrawal When He Was Denied His Rignt To THe. i . EF Eesti ve Assistance OF Counsel, THe Plea Was Nat : Understandings And The Plea Was Coe cea! | :