No. 19-7908

Larry Rashone Prunty v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-circuit 28-usc-2254 certificate-of-appealability due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus slack-v-mcdaniel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit err when applying the two prong Slack v. McDaniel test (procedure and merits) in determining the grant or denial of a certificate of appealability when the procedural aspects of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition were never in issue; thereby, denying petitioner due process of law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERR WHEN APPLYING THE TWO PRONG SLACK V. MCDANIEL, TEST (PROCEDURE AND MERITS) IN DETERMINING THE GRANT OR DENIAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WHEN THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF PETITIONER’S 28 U.S.C. § 2254 PETITION WERE NEVER IN ISSUE; THEREBY, DENYING PETITIONER DUE PROCESS OF LAW? Petition for Writ of Certiorari to The US Court of Appeal, 11 Cir. Page i a Page No.

Docket Entries

2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC to respond filed.
2020-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Inch, Sec., FL DOC
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Larry R. Prunty
Larry R. Prunty — Petitioner