Does a fruit-of-a-poisonous-tree follow from an initial erroneous ruling on timeliness of filing the initial complaint follow through subsequent ruling on review, so that all subsequent timeliness calculations must account for the initial untimeliness prejudice?

Questions Presented 1. Does a follow from an initial erroneous ruling on timeliness of filing the initial complaint follow through subsequent ruling S$ on review, so that all subsequent timeliness calculations must account for the initial untimeliness prejudice? 2. Did the District Court err in calculating the time for filing when the State Statute and court rules clearly begins the two year statute of limitations when the Order dismissing the criminal proceedings against Petitioner began when the Order is “filed” as opposed to when the Court stated on the record the case would be dismissed, but did not dismiss the matter until a later " date. 3. Did the District Court err in calculating the time for filing when the State Statute and court rules cleatly begins after a ninety day time for filing an appeal after the State gave notice of appeal. , 4. Did the Tenth Circuit err in dismissing Petitioner’s appeal, given the inception of the case began with an erroneous timeliness ruling against Petitioner. Ad |