No. 19-7913
Pooroushasb Parineh v. Michael Martel, Warden
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 actual-innocence aedpa civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process equitable-tolling federal-review habeas-corpus standing state-remedies statutory-tolling
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner filed a timely habeas corpus petition after exhausting state remedies
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (1) Pursuant to 28 USC 2244 & 2254, did the Petitioner file ea timely (AEDPA) Writ of Habeas Corpus/Petition from the State Court to Federal Court after exhausting state remedies via (i.e. Anneals & Writs)? (YES ){11 , (2) Per 28 Uc 2241-2243 (Non-AEDPA) and/or 28 USC 2254 (AEDPA) Habeas Cornus _ Writ reywew; is the Petitioner entitled to statutory and equitable tolling due to Actual of Justice cleims under the j-year timeline 28 USC 2244 to file habeas claims from the State Courts to Federal Courts? . : 7 ; (YES )it! ; / (i) Y * .
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)