No. 19-7916
Mark Gelazela v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3282 continuing-offense criminal-indictment criminal-procedure federal-prosecution lulling statute-of-limitations time-barred wire-fraud
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether after-the-fact 'lulling' allegations extend the statute of limitations for wire fraud beyond the five-year period authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3282(a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether after-the-fact “lulling” allegations extend the statute of limitations for wire fraud beyond the five-year period authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3282(a). --prefix-
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark Gelazela
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent