No. 19-7920

Iverylee Arashella Johnson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-violation due-process fifth-amendment sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington unreasonable-application unsworn-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Johnson's due process and Sixth Amendment confrontation clause protections violated by allowing Powell's unsworn testimony to be presented to the jury for consideration in their deliberations in violation of this Court's precedent and the Fifth and Sixth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Was Johnson’s due process and Sixth Amendment confrontation clause protections violated by allowing Powell’s unsworn testimony to be presented to the jury for consideration in their deliberations in violation of this Court’s precedent and the Fifth and Sixth Amendment? Was the permitting unsworn testimony at Johnson’s trial, an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by this Court. Was this Court’s landmark Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688 (1984) decision violated by the State Court’s decision? il

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-03-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)

Attorneys

Iverylee Johnson
Iverylee Arashella Johnson — Petitioner
Iverylee Arashella Johnson — Petitioner