Iverylee Arashella Johnson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Was Johnson's due process and Sixth Amendment confrontation clause protections violated by allowing Powell's unsworn testimony to be presented to the jury for consideration in their deliberations in violation of this Court's precedent and the Fifth and Sixth Amendment?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Was Johnson’s due process and Sixth Amendment confrontation clause protections violated by allowing Powell’s unsworn testimony to be presented to the jury for consideration in their deliberations in violation of this Court’s precedent and the Fifth and Sixth Amendment? Was the permitting unsworn testimony at Johnson’s trial, an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by this Court. Was this Court’s landmark Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688 (1984) decision violated by the State Court’s decision? il