Whether the Supreme Court of California erred by not granting and transferring the Appellant's Writ of Mandate of original jurisdiction back to the Court of Appeal to correct their miscalculation of the timeliness of the Appellant's Petition of Transfer?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The appellate procedure for Limited Civil cases in California, specifically writ of mandates have taken on numerous procedures in order to have review. Years ago a denial of a writ of mandate was an appealable order. Now appellate review is only through applications and petitions for transfers that limit the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of California if the transfer is denied per Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.1018 and 8.500, including when transfer is denied by the courts miscalculation of whether it was timely filed and both Courts are immediately divested of jurisdiction and any remedy to ensure due process. Two questions are presented: ; . 1. Whether the Supreme Court of California erred by not granting and transferring the Appellant’s Writ of Mandate of original jurisdiction back to the Court of Appeal to correct their miscalculation of the timeliness of the Appellant’s Petition of Transfer? 2. Whether the denial of the Appellant’s Writ of Mandate is a violation of Due Process in . violation of the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments? 1