WHETHER THE Trial Court Abused Discretion in allowing a Rage, Hansa h tlie Oe 2 a, MLN ae AoUurs. is a samt ot OSs stylte of Coupse/ Sok ALling to GQ CL SEC/i) Contoived Lat Hat li] Moves, of Subheessed Aurdlenee Dat Let+pwee Lp: tA to obft ii. Counsef U.S, CA Cp AmenaAtlé) GNA USL: bie Const Hen é obits On L040). [Ws Clef104. A ALLiNg fa) old a Ca Ing hat Constitutes Keasowahle Conduct Ghd lop 3 YAe2 PCL withered for deo -thped Eindence #2 Zo UNINVES 93 HH 0k at least Challenged, Unde ZF, vols Lyles

WHETHER, Tilosé Conshodprar ek Arg his URLe Vt0(4HE0 , avid Pore Gs THE VETET COWRA FPS Rrgwr< to Dye Meocesth US .Ch Constr A IM,

Whether the trial court abused discretion in denying petitioner's request for counsel