Whether District Judge May erred in dismissing the petitioner's complaint as frivolous

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Whether District Judge May erred when Dismissing [Petitioners’] “Complaint” as frivolous, in “this” matter? Furthermore, whether [the “Judge”] considered “record of evidence”, (document) dated, June 15, 2016 (The “document” which confirmed the wrongful “offset”; and [reset] the statutory time), when Dismissing [Petitioners’] “Complaint”, of the Order dated July 23, 2018; and further Dismissing [Petitioners’] (“IFP”’) Application, to proceed in the Court of Appeals (based on [Petitioners’] “Complaint” action; of Order dated August 24, 2018? 2. Whether Court of Appeals Judge, [who failed to sign “its” name legibly and failed to provide date of submission of its Judgment (the matters of appropriations which constitutes a legitimate “Order”)]; whether (the “Judge”) considered “all” facts of evidence specifically the (document) dated June 15, 2016, in “this” case action; when making “its” determination of Dismissing [Petitioners’] “Complaint”, as frivolous by agreeing with lower court Judge May; of [its] “Order”? (The Appeal “Order” which did not provide a date; however, envelope postdate of January 25, 2019) 3. Additionally, Whether the Court of Appeals “Judges”, erred, when making [its] ; decision, of the acclaimed “Order” (no submission date appears); however, attached clerks letter/envelope post dated March 13, 2019; failing to allow Petitioners’ Motion for Summary Judgment/Direct Verdict (“separate case”) and request for court appointed 2 attorney; of the matters of “claims”, whereby, [The “case action” filed by (Defendant) — Education Management Corp.; in the Bankruptcy Court—State of Delaware, filed on June 29, 2018), (Parties of Interest) to the Bankruptcy “case action’’(State of Delaware), were wrongfully granted priority; in the case matter? 4. Whether District Judge May erred, when mentioning “this” (case action); as grounds for exercising the “All Writs Act”? And whether Judge May rightfully appropriated, “its” concerns of addressing the “matters” of claims against “Petitioner”; as stated, oo I “harassing.(her) opponents’ and-encroaching-the judicial-system”]; as it relates to the oes “case action” (U.S .ex. rel./Townsend v. NLRB), to invoke (grounds of jurisdictions); in the “Order” dated January 23, 2019? 5. Whether District Judge Michael L. Brown (State of Georgia), discern appropriately, concerning “Petitioner Townsends” (“Writ of Certiorari”) docketed July 30, 2019; of his “Order” dated August 16, 2019; of [ “Petitioner Townsends” case action (priority claim) against Education Management et., al.]; when concluding to Enforce the “All Writs Act”, and Dismiss : “Townsends” case action; under the governance, thereof? [The “Al/ Writs Act” which was “ordered” and initiated on January 23, 2019, by District Judge Leigh Martin May (State of Georgia)] . Continue on next page... 6. Whether any of these “government officials’, conclude appropriately and with consciousness of “Petitioner Townsends” rights, in determination of judgment; as “it” relates to [Article III] procedural jurisdiction, and as “it” relates to...redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statue, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States? 3 ; CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS = U.S. Department of Education—Federal Student Aid and “all” associated names U.S. Department of Education/ Office of General Counsel . 400 Maryland Avenue S. W., Washington, DC 20202 = FMS investment Corp. (FMS) District Judge Leigh Martin May P. O. Box 1423 (served by MAIL delivery—for clerk to place in : Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-1423 assigned mailbox of District Court) 4 Debtor Debtor’s Attorney —_ Education Management IT, LLC and Jay Jaffle Its affiliates Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 210 Sixth Ave, 3"4 Floor ¥ 600 East 96t» Street, Suite