No. 19-7945
Zacharias Abab Aguedo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit insufficient-evidence judgment-of-acquittal sentencing sentencing-errors sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence was insufficient to support Aguedo's conviction and his motions for judgment of acquittal should have been granted
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED AGUEDO’S CONVICTIONS WHERE THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT AGUEDO’S CONVICTION AND THEREFORE, AGUEDO’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED. Il. CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED AGUEDO’S SENTENCE WHERE THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED SENTENCING ERRORS. F
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Zacharias Aguedo
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner