No. 19-7948
Omar N. Davis v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner's due process rights were violated due to ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The main question in this petition is whether a petitioner’s due process rights were violated because he had ineffective assistance of counsel. Here, trial counsel failed to advise the petition of his maximum sentencing exposure that he faced if he went to trial. Moreover, trial counsel also failed to advise the defendant of the outstanding plea offers propounded by the State.
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Omar Omar Davis
Theodore Sliwinski — Theodore Sliwinski, Petitioner
Theodore Sliwinski — Theodore Sliwinski, Petitioner
Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.
Mario C. Formica — Respondent
Mario C. Formica — Respondent