Did the warrantless search of an automobile exceed the scope of the automobile exception?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the warrantless search of an automobile pursuant to the automobile exception become unreasonable when police officers expanded the search beyond the time and intensity required to locate the object of the search? 2) Does the removal of the disjunctive “or” from a statutory list give rise to ambiguity such that legislative history can be considered when interpreting such statute? 3) Is a defendant entitled to jury instructions which consistently instruct the jury on the term “possession?”