No. 19-7959

John Tedesco v. Tammy Ferguson, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion access-to-courts civil-rights court-access due-process grievance-process injunctive-relief personal-involvement retaliation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the plaintiff entitled to injunctive relief?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 14.1 (a) (A) WAS THE PLAINTIFF ENTITLED TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ? (B ) WAS THE PLAINTIFF PROVIDED WITH DUE PROCESS ?. ((C) WAS THE PLAINTIFF ALLEGEDLY RETALIATED AGAINST ?. (.D ) WAS THE PLAINTIFF IMPEDED FROM PRESENTING COGNIZABLE CLAIMS TO THE COURT?. (E ) DID THE PLAINTIFF HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS TO THE COURTS ?. ( F ) IS THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GRIEVANCE PROCESS MEANINGFUL UNDER PLAINTIFF'S CIRCUMSTANCES . : (G ) DID THE DEFENDANTS HAVE PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ?. (H ) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ALLEGEDLY ABUSE IT'S DISCRETION IN DISMISSING ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ?. :

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2020)

Attorneys

John Tedesco
John Michael Tedesco — Petitioner
John Michael Tedesco — Petitioner