No. 19-7960
Reginald Edward Green v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment prejudicial-evidence prison-garb shackles
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is displaying a defendant shackled, handcuffed, in prison garb prejudicial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is displaying a picture of a defendant shackled, handcuffed, in prison garb and being held by prison staff, over objection, still more prejudicial than probative, and a violation of a fundamentally fair trial under the Fifth Amendment, in American courtrooms or can it be disregarded based upon unfounded procedural grounds? 2
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2020)
Attorneys
Reginald Green
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent