HabeasCorpus
Did the trial court and appellate court err in entering a finding of guilt on a single count robbery when the government did not prove petitioner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
ESTION(S) PRESENTED \. Did the tial Code And The Appellate Court error within entering a finding of quilt On a Single count Robbery when the government Cid net Prove petitioner | eais guilty beyond a reasenable doubt 7 2. Was the Circuit Court within their Governmental Rights to have Charged an indictment offense of Robbery, And alse rye ape » ha of Robbery when the Ceminal complauit Ceports @ difterent Neon Alon OCCUNTANCE T Under tying facts) 3. Ls the Defendant deprived of his due process, t ightS uncer she Constitutions of the Stote cf Titinois ond the Unde States 2 4 Was the dnal Tudge Bas and prejudice to have found she . ) Defendant guilty anid Sentenced the Defendant 40 an extended | term sentencing Because the yudge believed the Defendant was . guilty based on Defendants priot criminal convicts ans 7 | : LIST. OF PARTIES (We All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ( ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . all