No. 19-7990
Gabriel L. Roman v. Sarah H. Kim, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: california-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process first-amendment free-speech legal-access standing vexatious-litigant
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the California Vexatious Litigant Statute is Unconstitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether the California Vexatious Litigant Statute is Unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent Armen Kassabian, M.D. to respond filed.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Armen Kassabian, M.D.
Rodney G. Tomlison — Schmid & Voiles, Respondent
Rodney G. Tomlison — Schmid & Voiles, Respondent