No. 19-8004

Lamarcus Harvey v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) attempted-bank-robbery bank-robbery circuit-split crime-of-violence elements-clause intimidation statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17 (distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether bank robbery by intimidation qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s elements clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | I. Bank Robbery, (the basis for attempted bank robbery) which may be committed by unintentionally intimidating a victim, or by presenting to the teller a demand note does not have as an clement “the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another” Il. Attempted Bank Robbery may be committed without the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force, and therefore fails to qualify as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)’s elements clause II. While the Eleventh Circuit (and many other circuits) has held fast to the notion that bank robbery by intimidation qualifies as a “crime of violence” under § 924 (c)’s elements clause, some other circuits have recently determined similar state statutes to not qualify as “violent felonies” under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, creating a conflict amongst the Circuit courts. i i

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-11-19
Supplemental brief of petitioner Lamarcus Harvey filed.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Reply of petitioner Lamarcus Harvey filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-29
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-06-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2020.
2020-06-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-06-01
Response Requested. (Due July 1, 2020)
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-06
Rescheduled.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2020)

Attorneys

Lamarcus Harvey
Mark A ReyesHoward & Reyes. Chartered, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent