Whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018 applies where Petitioner's sentence is not final and he would no longer be subject to multiple, mandatory, consecutive sentences under § 924(c)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018, enacted while Petitioner’s case was pending on direct appellate review, apply where his sentence is not yet final and where Petitioner would no longer be subject to multiple, mandatory, consecutive sentences under § 924(c) pursuant to the newly enacted and clarifying provisions of the Act? I. Whether the Eleventh Circuit misapplied this Court’s precedent, as set forth in Edwards v. Arizona, where Petitioner’s unrebutted, uncontroverted testimony clearly established that he unequivocally invoked his right to counsel? i