No. 19-8016
Jaime Vega, aka Jimmy Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appeals criminal-procedure district-court due-process revocation-sentence sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
To what extent does 18 U.S.C. § 3553 require a district court to specifically state the reasons for imposing a revocation sentence above the guidelines sentencing range?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED To what extent does 18 U.S.C. § 3553 require a district court to specifically state the reasons for imposing a revocation sentence above the guidelines sentencing range?
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Jaime Vega
Andrea Renee St. Julian — Law Office of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner
Andrea Renee St. Julian — Law Office of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent