Does the California Supreme Court's holding in People v. Breverman (1998) inadvertently impose an unlawful state of ambiguity when faced with the federal rule that now properly presents?

QUESTIONS PResented 3 . x. 4 CAN TF, Ton arian avneen wavionn, an innigert prisoner, $1,516) petitiole 5 AND 42 vses $1923 Civil RGnTT pIAINTIFF, APPENRING IN peeppia PERSONA 6 ReFore THE BAR OF THis RereReD COURT , REQUEST THAT THE COURT rove 7 TTS WWHERNISCEY POWER AND ExeRciSeE FIs DiscreTIoNAR POWERS EY 8 GRANTING Ceview oF THE PETHION Fot WRIT cE PMANLAMITS . UNDER THE 9 PaNisior! Faind in THE SvpREME CouRT Qule 20.1, THAT CAN BE 10 EXECISEDA IN THs CoVETS APPEllaTE ToBisnichon . iF WHEN, THE UNITED STHTES CovRT oF APPERL FoR THE NINTH CiRcuIT DENIED THE 12 Petition FoR Writ oF mANDAMYS THAT Whe Timely Fileg AND DENTED oN ane) Aecember 127,2014, (Ex 4.) I4 | WHERE, THE PETITIONER SAVGHT TO HAVE THE USCA. ISSVE AN ORDER Di Rect 15 The UNITED STATES AlsTRICT CovVRT FoR THE EASTERN OfsTercT oF CAliFoRNTA Te 16 GRANT Petitioner? Timely File) Petition FoR weit -F MANBAMUS THAT was 7 Seperately FileD As Arf ATTACHMENT (nt operation With, AND int Conyutcticn! 18 witli}, PEItIONER /PIAINTIFES Ongeins §14G3 CINil RighTS PRecerdings, 19 THAT WS AENTEN ON OCTOBER "T™, 2619 (ex Bb.) . 20 Petitioner / PltiwtirF SEES InyuNctive Reliep FROM THE USAC, IN THe 21 Fora oF MANDAMW FILSI(4)(2) To ENJoIN THE CAUFORNIA SUPREME 22 CUURT TO ASSUME JvRisAictioN ovER Rigutiully 23 PReseeven Federal QvEsTions THAT CALiFaariA Has LEFT open AND 24 VN ACARESSED FOR NER 22 YERRS, uNdER F133] 25 BY GRANTING The peTitioN , biREcTING THE CHtifoanIA Supreme CovRT To 26]. ACATE TTS ORDER GeMinG Review IN CASE NO. $250933 (ec) 27 LEMANAING THE CAYSE Kown TO THe CALIFORNIA CovET oF APPERL ,3°° AppEllATE 28 DisteeT CASE NO. COBTAS| WITH DigecTions THAT yleRE TETRIM Noth oF 1 ADNRESSING PettoNERs CenTRAL SuBMission OF HIS FeNeRALITED claim 2 THAT RRE NOW Newegated in Solemmiry CoRAM tubice. 3 1c 4 DOES TRE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURTS HOIbING IN PropleN. BeNearAdl 5 (1998) 1 SUPRA, 14 Cal. dt ax PS-1UB AFFIRMING THT THE ROLE Bedvivng 6 SUR SPONTE [NSTENCTIONS ON ALL LESSER MeEcessARIIN Weluded oFrenses 7 SVPPORTED BA THE ENINENceE [ie A nord Capitol case] QeRweEs Exclusively 8 FROM CALFORNIA Law'(p.\U%) INADNERTENTIY EMpOSE AM onlawiL 9 STATE OF AMBIGUITY wits Faced wit THE reneenl Hileman THAT 10 AMET Now PROPER PRESENTS. II TL. 12 DOES THE PVE PROCESS CIANSE OF THE UNITED STATES ConsTIMTION, 13 REQUIRE PECKLAVR CALFoRMIA Crimisel JUR pasteyctionys TWAT 1s] UW SWERENTIY, Possess PRESUMPTINE QUALITIES, eh CERTHIA Wgtndted 15 THET Wovld CRRRY A FedeRaly Auitorrzed DETACHMENT ERort 16 | A RENIENTH&, COURTS ARBITRARIIY CAPRICIONS ABIAY TD FIND 17 A ARCK OF SVCR A CereQoRizeD stencton , WHeTER omitted 18 Bi RaECTION oR WoT GINEN SuM SPORTE, BEI SuoyEcT To 19 CAUMRWIAS HARMLESS ERROR STANOAED FoR ANAINSIS Wile ASSESH] 20 PREWAICE, WHEN TME UNtTED STHTES SvPREME COURT HAS 2 DETERMINED Ceemmin’ omissions oF Lesser Included ofrense 22 IWsreNertans As "STRVCTURRL ERROR’ AND FenerAllY Reversible 23 UNDER CHAPMAN AS pRedvdice is AvromMiol nrrected BY 24 THe IVS NABIY to AEUBERNTE OVER THe OmiTED [Nsteveria 25 Inteeently presumptne QvaAlibes THeT cH bE emteR 26]. prreche. > "AN ElemenNT oF THe oFrense cHaRged “on aTrAcihed 27 To " AN ELEMENT OF tthe DEFENSE THEORY OF Tite CASE Wintwtic 28 The AereWOAYT HAS BOild His defense upon.” ~ | TW. 2 DOES CRUFCRNIA TRIAL COURTS EXER HINE A DOTY UNHER THe , 3 FEQERML CONSTHUTLON -TD GINE SUA SPORTE A WERT oF PASSION! 4 INSTRUCTION , Witeke Wanted By the EXIDENCE, In A Bord 5 CARTON CASE, As THe lesser Included ofFeNnse |nstercrions 6 ON NOONTHEY MANSAVENTER ONDER The TORI cE PASSION 4 PRELOCION , \ritkererly RELATES TO THe PRosecuTIONS wvenerd | 8 OF PRNING AN Element oF The OFTERSE cinRaed, 9 Kv a 19 WHEN A TREL COVET FRIIS TD SUM SPORTE |NSOTRNCT YOON THE . I CATEGORICAL Sele HETENSE WHILE RESISTIPG THE Comission OF 12 A ROBBER, VEN “THE Wdle TRIAL AND THe berevdrrits Eiier 13 DETERSE WAS UIA UPON THIS Omitted (NsTeVetion | Koes THE it] RE FetnAeT WW THAT CHSE LANE A Febernily eaotected BignT 15 TH Dye PROCESS ANS iv His puksriT FoR