No. 19-8035
Manuel de Jesus Valencia v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confession-extraction constitutional-rights custodial-interrogation edwards edwards-rule fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment law-enforcement-deception miranda miranda-rights self-incrimination undercover-operations
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments permit a deceptive ploy in which uniformed and undercover officers work together to extract a confession from a suspect who has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights to silence and to counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments permit a deceptive ploy in which uniformed and undercover officers work together to extract a confession from a suspect who has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights to silence and to counsel. i
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2020)
Attorneys
California
J. Michael Lehmann — California Department of Justice, Respondent
J. Michael Lehmann — California Department of Justice, Respondent