Whether Mr. Jamison's § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), claiming that Johnson invalidates the pre-Booker mandatory Guidelines' residual clause in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2), is timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) because it invoked the 'right' that the Supreme Court 'newly recognized'?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Mr. Jamison’s § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), claiming that Johnson invalidates the preBooker mandatory Guidelines’ residual clause in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2), is timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) because it invoked the “right” that the Supreme Court “newly recognized”? i