No. 19-8051

Jack Benjamin Hessiani v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment grand-jury indictment indictment-defect jurisdictional-challenge mens-rea sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal courts have jurisdiction over a criminal matter when the charging document omits an essential element of the offense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review 1. The Circuits are divided over whether federal courts have jurisdiction over a criminal matter when the charging document omits an essential element of the offense. Does a defective indictment omitting the mens rea element that separates innocent conduct from criminal conduct fail to charge a criminal offense and deprive the federal court of jurisdiction? 2. The Circuits need clarification on the proper scope of review for determining whether an indictment omitting an essential mens rea element violates a defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment grand jury rights. To determine whether an indictment omitting the essential mens rea element of an offense violates a defendant’s grand jury rights, can a reviewing court hold the error harmless based solely on trial evidence presented to the petit jury? ii

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Jack Hessiani
Cristen ThayerFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Cristen ThayerFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent