No. 19-8053
Daniel Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-1951 18-usc-924 aiding-and-abetting crime-of-violence economic-harm federal-criminal-law hobbs-act property-rights sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b) is categorically a 'crime of violence' as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b) is categorically a “crime of violence” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), if the plain language of § 1951(b) and several circuits’ pattern Hobbs Act robbery instructions indicate the offense may be committed non-violently — by causing fear of purely economic harm to property, which can include intangible rights? II. Whether aiding and abetting a “crime of violence” is automatically and categorically a “crime of violence”? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Daniel Rodriguez
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent