Does the substantive rule of Miller v. Alabama apply to de facto life sentences for juveniles?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1, Does the substantive rule of Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), apply to de facto life sentences for juveniles, as the solid majority of jurisdictions to consider the question have held? 2. Does Brown’s 100-year sentence, with earliest possible release at age 62, constitute a de facto life sentence? 3. Did the Indiana Court of Appeals misinterpret Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S.Ct. 718 (2016), when it held that Indiana’s parole system, which provides no discretion or opportunity to present evidence of rehabilitation, was an adequate remedy for a Miller violation? Page 2 of 22