Whether New Jersey's revised juvenile waiver statute (N.J.S.A. 2A:4A-26.1(c)) which prohibits the Family Court from waiving its jurisdiction over any juveniles under the age of 15 announced a new substantive rule that must be applied retroactively to cases on collateral review

No question identified. : oe Questios Pees ENTER FoR Review L. Whether doe tbo dhe ever wineloiinaly objective. Wdicia cof a _--_ddo\escent lntain development wludly dispcoving tne presumption Yak Apveniles who commit ecimes Mink \iMe_ adults aad canned ___ve cersdbilitated it can s\ill be held as Constitobional ondec _ the _3** Amendonent Gra. Family Couck bo waive it's yucisdichion vera \Y year old adolescent Sorc We snle pucpane of expcdina _Mne_l4_ yeacold +o odolt gensities Po _—L. whether nla Sersey's fecaakly covised venile wawer stole — NSA 2AsHA=2.1.0.4) — vihicla nous prakilbits ne Eacdily Carck tro waiving, it's yonsdicton everanyyoieniles wader tee age of 1S annowwed a nen svlstantive cole Yast vacec Mae Constitution must be applied cetcoactively bo cases on collatera| Ceview> 2 ; : . ; } a TABLE OF CosVENTS 2 <= __* Statement of Jurisdiction _.# Stetementk of dhe Case . Lege Acauenent ee © 1. ihe pcofeund advances in.ouc Scienihic understanding, of adolesenk development neve tMaperect 8 seismic slai@e in jowenile apshice juris prudence nationwide. A Roper Simmons CG Ocothar ws Elocida __ C. Willer. Alalnama oe ID. New Jersey's \egistatocs. acknowledge Mais Couck’s nasty a _ Socmed_peincigle Mas youta mabtecs vader Hoe ConsiituHea oy prowiding, wider Eidaia Amendnnen + prorechions fee ee jpveaile oFenders Bilowiag, significant. ceSems to Moe 2 systeod.. TTL, An accused IU year old adolescent's Bin _Amencdmenk vausal_euaisaments” is violated when a Family Couck waives A¥'s \urisdichion. imorcdec te cae OBE. Nne€.\4 year old to adult criminal. penalies.. 2 SL. TE les Jersey's cevised yuvenile waiver atetube prohibiting Yhe_waiver of juveniles vader \5 years old 0 _. under Ane Constitution must loe.cpplied cetmacdively to Oe ne CEBES_ON Co\laberal Ceview. 2 __* Conclusion a 6 _ _]MBLF OF GED AgIicgtes CONSTITUTIONAL. “Provisions NN Consh, etal ie 20.5. Const. Amend. WIT FEDERA CASES MMs Vv. virmons, 5320s. 304 zoo) _*Futman V. George, 408 vs. 04429 (i972) °G faham VW. Florida, _5b0_v.s.43 (oto) Vi Xb 8, 2112 I 15 Nb, 17,18, 20,2122. 23,24 2 Grega V. Georys 423 u.s.153 (19m) Mackey United Shotes HO) us blZ (97) —tMMerv.Algboma, _BbTos 4bolzoi2) I 10, 20 “Montgomery V. Louisiana, Ilo S.c%. 718 (zo) aK Peary V.Lynavoh, 492 0.8,302 (93a) 9 Roper Vv. Simmons; —543u.s.551 (2005) I 0 7 89 127, 20,21, 2H —Sehero Vv. Summertio, 5420.5. 348 (2004) —Tropv. Dulles , 350.8. 9b (1958) _*raleems V. United Stotes, 217 us. 349 (igi) 8 aJ. 515 (ia) By tin re Smigetsvi, 3on5.513 (1959) ty __# Kendall _v, Snedeker 219 n.d. Supe 283, ___ GSS, Supe, Che, Mom Div WAST) ___* State ex cel. VS. 34 wl). Supers USA, GUY Supe Ch ChDiv, 2007) tte GSD, Super Oh. Ape. Di 20u) ___* Stote in the \ntecest oF LE a Jwentle, N.). Aogetiste Division, Dekh lo, A=0802 1573 (June (le, 20\) : iS * State in the Interest of ).E,, Hubs abd, Sper, BI, Cni.d, Super, Ch, Ape. Biv. Zo\e) (322,235.24 ___ 9 State io the Interest of nth 22 aud. 242 (20s) ___t Skate v. Gey, 2 WSUS Cassy Ne p+ Sishe ve densoo A aS (assy) ___¢ State vs Preciose ams asitiga) __ Streak v. Universal Macs, 300 si), Sopec, STB, . oo CD Super Cte App. Dig AAD) tn SA2ALYA-2 Cevised Anust\O,2018) ae 2S AAIA-2e,\ C0) 24,27 ta SA ZASHA=261 (Gepealecd AT pe, Gourk B32 tt Hs ® Nwd. Court R, 3222-2 : , vit nt Sed, Cock Be B22 \yv x a . , 0.5.5. c4.R.10 (ce) Vs APD Scers-AneovS ss _*ACH of Mugust 10,2015 ,Ch.89,20I5 Nd. ted 89 tdeffrey Arnes+,Reci\ess Pelovior in Adolescence: A __ Developmental Prospechve , 12 Developmental Rev. 239 (1e2) NLS Cougust gos) a __*Mielnele Derte_e+ al._, From ime_out to tard Times Young Clildren_in_the Adult Criminal_dushee system (2009 _*Koising the Age.t Shufing 4o.9 Sever and more Eefecke —lovemle_dushee System dushice Pohey institute Moreh 7,20. “Reforms 40 the Juvenile doshoe System icommebee ——Meeting 00 $. 200% Betore the S. Lau & Pub. Satepy Comm'n, 2ioth Veo. 2d sess.(varch 12, 20,5) NB 23,2014) | ieee : “Bint A NSA 2A:4A-26 (repealed August to,20is) dN