No. 19-806

Michael S. Barth v. Township of Bernards, New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2019-12-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: certiorari-review civil-procedure constitutional-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction legal-precedent procedural-due-process standing supreme-court-review takings tax truck-council
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether to revisit or distinguish National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 515 U.S. 582 (1995) and General Motors Corp. v. City of Linden, 143 N.J. 336 (1996)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED There are a number of questions and sub questions whether to revisit, or distinguish this case from, National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. : Oklahoma Tax Commission, 515 U.S. 582 (1995); alternatively distinguish this case from the denial for petition for certiorari in General Motors Corp. v. City . of Linden, 143 N.J. 336 (1996), cert denied 519 U.S. 816 (1996); or uniquely and independently consider these facts and circumstances to grant certiorari on grounds because of the federal unconstitutional process of the court below (see infra), in whatever terms it should be characterized.

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-16
Waiver of right of respondents Somerset County [New Jersey] Board of Taxation, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent Township of Bernards to respond filed.
2019-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael S. Barth
Michael S. Barth — Petitioner
Michael S. Barth — Petitioner
Somerset County [New Jersey] Board of Taxation, et al.
Michelline Capistrano FosterNew Jersey Attorney General's Office - Division of Law, Respondent
Michelline Capistrano FosterNew Jersey Attorney General's Office - Division of Law, Respondent
Township of Bernards
Martin AllenDiFrancesco, Bateman, Kunzman, Davis, Lehrer & Flaum, P.C., Respondent
Martin AllenDiFrancesco, Bateman, Kunzman, Davis, Lehrer & Flaum, P.C., Respondent