Why the NH State Supreme Court think all those facts of Judge's violating numerous laws, the court procedure, the Constitutions, and the facts that this case was proceeded in corrupted ways with frauds and criminal actions, are all normal circumstance?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Why the NH State Supreme Court think all those facts of Judge’s violating . . numerous laws, the court procedure, the Constitutions, and the facts that this _ case was proceeded in corrupted ways with frauds and criminal actions, are ; . _all normal circumstance? ; 2. The NH justice system is to support and encourage those frauds/crime and . the violation to the laws and Constitutions or to pursuit the Justice? : 3. Why no written Motion for Periodic Payments was filed as per the laws? . ___ 4, Why no notice of hearing on payment was issued as per the laws for the ) ; Judgment Debtor/Petitioner to appear at a time and date to the court? : 5. Why Judgment Creditor/Responder never sent or got it served to Petitioner _ in-hand or by certified mail of the notice of hearing or even his letter to clerk? 6. Why there was never a hearing on this Periodic Payments required by laws? 7. Without any hearing, the Petitioner was ordered behind him in the court WRIT ' ; : OF EXECUTION on 9/8/2016 to pay $25,569, why the Petitioner's name was not on the CC list of the writ and he was totally prevented to know this writ? a ) 8. Why the court order on 9/12/2016 for sending out the WRIT on $25,936 was ; , never sent to the Petitioner, and his name was not even on the CC list? 9. Why the Judge did all above-mentioned frauds to violate numerous laws, to . prevent Petitioner to know the truth and made him missed appeal deadline? . 10.All those activities of preventing the Petitioner to know the court documents, including the Responder’s letter demanding the payment, WRIT and court order, were violating the Constitutional Rights of the Petitioner? 11. Why the Judge violated the court Procedure on purpose and prevented the . ~ scheduled pre-trial of case No. 431-2016-SC-00081 on 6/8/2016 to occur? . . ) 12.The law requires the court make pre-trial orders for the scheduled pre-trial : case, but the Judge on purpose never did this. Was it violating the law? 13. The Petitioner was not a “Landlord”, but case #431-2016CV-00010 was filed based on the Petitioner was a Landlord, should this case be dismissed? 14. The Judge acted as Responder’s attorney, modified the Claim for Responder and made the illegally filed case continued. Was that what Judge should do? 15. The two court orders were conflicting (