Whether petitioner was denied due process of law, a fair trial by an impartial jury, and equal protection of the laws

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW | + Wes. Petitioner denied Dve_Rrocess of law. foirtrialbg ee an—ingactial jury. —ond foc equal Pooredtion..ct te _law when lig Appellate e_shondard —— ot es O6..quovaniteed toy e688 ond _omendmentt_te the NS ConstitoNont | Wa 0004 of _low,.a factor hoy om———_ _Trmgurdial_ uty oll for_equal_pcotedion of Ane Laws wlvey ns ——_. GAME 5 _falt_below on _objechwve _— im grt to —_} Counsel_as_qua awteed_by tre 61 andi omentiwent jo te. NS Cowen? ———_] Woo ped doner_ denied Due Reavers ot low, .o fore Aca by _—_onweagoiah_ypty and. [or _E qual_pe Aedion—ok Ae low_in_ opposition _ ho is_chglito_ under Tne _ormerditqentt_49_ the U5.-Conshivhiont . — + law) foie Adal tay ey pengactialjoty.,onb Ae tow hen Relea —_fuuvteccog actor o_deNtvecatehy elicibel inceimpoatiog 6h okemen\s Acom oe cig te ——_— CQ Fo_ cera ditent high Ao counsel onbfoc_Doe_Rrerds of N --—Now., qual_peste cdon_of ow) Po_gvos osntecd to 5 Nre_5% 8) ond WW Amendment ]_——__ 3 | + Wor_get lone dented Due Peoress_of low ——_ondforo. fi A8ah_oy. on \ngerhal_yury when Jelierdidg cliched en Jacrienehing srmremenis_ was exroncorsly adm Meo alia viii — ch _ petitioners 52 6! ond MS ayer’ ow ——_ 1 Due Reocersof low), fai Adel toyag — rmpacdich—jory.,ond re | }ria_coutt_applied ——— na-oppestion to the. 525, 6%, and WE omvendwverts tothe Ud._Constitation? ee fie Heal tog om _. ———frmgosdia \ory,,.and for equad_pratecdion cf lowwhenpelitiones ea Serrenceond verdict were labedon Funds ngs—by tne Aci couch cellver—_. ———} ran boy— tne jury in _opyosition Yo_congiitetiondh 6 akeguacds establghdt —_} rye 520 and ES omtendmedieto_ ane, comstitoion2 + Woo_roltioner dened Doe Reacess of low, 1 a Lo¢ A009) Toy aon paca —___ nn {typed of Ane yyro¢ Was —_ Wah adh apalieds by Hue ivi couch focdner mote the courk_ecronesosly. cefvbed to_enease — ‘vtors_ Fon, CAUSE! Jbokn_on Voi DMG in_opgeddion Ao_geliiionels ——-_] -o_o_ uot onieed_toy_ re Si, ond_IW omnendimertty tothe | Wehed stokes Condit en _2 Woo _pedidionec_deried Doe Reotess_cF laws wockerc Neyo re \engochio\yoty ond. 0 Equa Rectedion cof Noe law awhen Abe —— Mb shget to. coonself_etitioners | chacce in violation of pekitioners ci glit_ to. counsel as qvocenteed bye ond IN omendredo to tbe 05. constehion2 og a |__ Wao petitioner deve), Doe Rewer flow a faicchilaby.on POTN jC, 005 fo gor Recledion of at NeW 06.0.06¢bil ene ae ok rmpesed_oceyubice ,inclo Sn — NSC nok nperred deh wnong; Marv ance andoane a2 ayBicld ose upie@ —_— Levmerner'dence oman active ¢ enamges el) veh yn 09208 Noes a Note 622,62) .ond HE OM SEWN OW ee —_— 1 Woy .gdidione doieh Due Reocesh Ka \aannja fe Nedbj —_—___. on cngedtad._yts ond foc tapi gsctedion of ave law py tie —_]combned_effe cd Kovadiovaboally ONDE LO SWAN OY) | Cosnonadvon safenbeadine detewse nc ers pe cand le Awan aK —_ recwive_woatb nave lorem hel Reese ncomdsined. cumilebivg | 10 HL MOA _He SE_eandh 2 amendined Ane Ub _ Conta De -R6 06055— C1002 ee SUPREME COURT oF THE UNITED, STATES Ockober Term, 201% ‘ _t ' , OO LON OILS, ent Pekinoner . : | eer ern cence oN 5 spencers eer People of the state of Limos, . es [eT OC, ae . : SINTRODVCTION © ; a, | So ECM TUSTICE_LORLINE UNITED. STATES ANO TO te ASSOC ATE JUSTICES _OF TIME, SUPREME, COURT_OF [IE ONT TEDL STATES $$] oy Pest ne C00 CY ee eel tenn — 3 Brandon —Lovor_ banks, fespecdfolly pray tlnad on wrk fh _cectrorors issue to review We dedsion ol_the Appeldte Cook ok Avinoly, FEA Jobidal Distinct. eee _. TAQLE_OF CONTENTS : ; QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Page Dot cette | are ABLE OF AUTMORIT TES Page 56 a] REFERENCE TOTME OPENTON | Page a] RS DICTION oe | CON SATUS ONAL PROMISING OO Page Gat pa] STATE MENTOF FACTS Rae Zc on ARV MENT Page I CONC LUGNON Rage |_n ARREN DX ATTACHMENTS) 2 __MohoN TO.PROCEED IN ROR MAPaveE RS]. RECEIVED] aA So APPOINT COUNSEL | FEB 28 2020 | SOPRER COG GERK | S a TARE OF AUTHORETIES oe cr ROOD, BINS. UO (QE) + Moston VANS. , BIT y.5 TOV (dea). edna by NAS toma, HON