No. 19-808
Leibundguth Storage & Van Service, Inc. v. Village of Downers Grove, Illinois
Tags: commercial-speech content-based content-based-speech first-amendment free-speech government-restriction reed-v-gilbert reed-v-town-of-gilbert strict-scrutiny
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should strict scrutiny review apply to government restrictions on commercial speech that do not apply to non-commercial speech?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, this Court clarified that content-based restrictions are those that apply to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed, and reaffirmed that content-based restrictions on speech require strict scrutiny review. Government restrictions on commercial speech that do not apply to non-commercial speech are content-based. Should strict scrutiny review apply in such a challenge?
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-11
Reply of petitioner Leibundguth Storage & Van Service, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-27
Brief of respondent Village of Downers Grove, Illinois in opposition filed.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Leibundguth Storage & Van Service, Inc.
Jeffrey Michael Schwab — Liberty Justice Center, Petitioner
Village of Downers Grove, Illinois
Scott Michael Day — Day Robert & Morrison PC, Respondent