No. 19-8081
Juan Isaac Flores v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: benefits constitutional-rights counsel-performance effective-counsel ineffective-assistance plea-agreement sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was my Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel violated by Attorney Kovtun's ineffectiveness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : (1) Was my Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel violated by Attorney Kovtun's ineffectiveness? (2) Is the process that preceded the May 3, 2018 plea agreement fair and/or reliable? ; (3) Did I lose benefits I would have received but for counsel's . ineffective assistance? oo (4) Was I elgible for a sentence reduction? z ‘ . .
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2019-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2020)
Attorneys
California
Daniel Brian Rogers — Office of the California Attorney General, Respondent
Daniel Brian Rogers — Office of the California Attorney General, Respondent