No. 19-8089
Michael W. Jenkins v. Brigitte Amsberry
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus ninth-circuit slack-standard slack-v-mcdaniel statutory-interpretation statutory-standard
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Ninth Circuit's ruling, denying a Certificate of Appealabiliy to a habeas corpus petitioner, contravene the statutory standard, under 28 U.S.C. §2253 (c) (2), for issuance of such a certificate, as set forth in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, denying a Certificate of Appealabiliy to a habeas corpus petitioner, contravene the statutory standard, under 28 U.S.C. §2253 (c) (2), for issuance of such a certificate, as set forth in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)? §
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent Brigitte Amsberry to respond filed.
2020-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Brigitte Amsberry
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Michael Jenkins