No. 19-8093
Jose Passalacqua v. Mike McDonald, Warden
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure jury-misconduct motion-standard ninth-circuit rule-60(b) rule-60b scope-of-hearing successive-petition
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Erred In Holding That Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion, Was the Equivalent to an Unauthorized Second or Successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Petition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Ninth Circuit Erred In Holding That Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion, Was the Equivalent to an Unauthorized Second or Successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Petition? i .
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 23, 2020)
2020-01-27
Application (19A823) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 23, 2020.
2020-01-14
Application (19A823) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.