Whether the Court of Appeals erred in treating the evidentiary issue as forfeited and subject to only plain error review under Evidence Rule 103 and Criminal Rule 52(b)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Under Evidence Rule 103 and Criminal Rule 52(b), once a party informs the court of the substance of the evidence at issue, and the court rules, counsel need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error. Petitioner offered expert testimony at sentencing, which the district court rejected. Did the Court of Appeals err in treating this evidentiary issue as forfeited and subject to only plain error review? i