Have the Utah courts adopted a rule of law which, in applying the 'heightened clarity' standard as expanded by Berghuis v. Thompkins, dispensed with any consideration of the issue whether the State has established that the suspect possessed the requisite level of comprehension to knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights?

QUESTION PRESENTED Have the Utah courts adopted a rule of law which, in applying the “heightened clarity” standard as expanded by Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010), dispensed with any consideration of the issue whether the State has established that the suspect possessed the requisite level of comprehension to knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights? ii