No. 19-8106
Salvador Arteaga Aragon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review conspiracy court-of-appeals criminal-conviction criminal-law due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency judicial-review petitioner standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in finding sufficient evidence to sustain petitioner's conspiracy conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals erred in finding sufficient evidence to sustain petitioner’s conspiracy conviction. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Salvador Arteaga Aragon
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent