whether-the-court-of-appeals-denying-application-for-certificate-of-appealability

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate of Appealability and Petition for Rehearing/Rehearing en Banc is contrary to this Court's decisions in Henderson v Shinseki,562 U.S 428 ;Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections v Schacht,524 U.S. 381; Zadvydas v Davis,533 U.S. 678. Resulted in a denial of Due Process when Petitioner was not given opporunity to challenge jurisdiction 2. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate of Appealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when a coerced statement was used against Petitioner at his trial which is contrary to this Court's decisions in Haynes v Washington, 373 U.S. 503; Kaupp v Texas, 538 U.S. 626;Hardy v U.S.,186 U.S. 224; Mallory v Hogan, 378 U.S. 1;Brown v Illinois,422 U.S. 590. 3. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate of Appealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when Petitioner was forced to proceed with unwanted counel contrary to this Court's decisions in Faretta v California, 442 U.S. 806; Wiggins v Smith, 539 U.S. 510; Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738. 4. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate of Applealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when Petitioner was arrested pretextually and not promptly presented before a magistrate contrary to this Court's decisions in Mallory v U.S. ,354 U.S.449;Boyd v U.S., 116 U.S. 616; Ferguson v City of Charleston ,533 U.S. 67. . W