No. 19-8117
Vincent D. White, Jr. v. Donnie Morgan, Warden
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 constitutional-issue due-process exhaustion-doctrine federal-constitutional-issue federal-habeas procedural-default state-courts state-prisoner statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
19-1023
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts should exclusively apply 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b) when evaluating State assertions that a State prisoner has failed to properly raise, and conclude, a federal constitutional issue in the State's courts?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED In federal habeas cases, whether federal courts should exclusively apply 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b) when evaluating State assertions that a State prisoner has failed to properly raise, and conclude, a federal constitutional issue in the State’s courts?
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-29
Rescheduled.
2020-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-03-30
Brief of respondent Donnie Morgan, Warden in opposition filed.
2020-03-30
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2020-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Donnie Morgan, Warden
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent