Wendell Brown aka Menes Ankh El v. Superior Court of Indiana, Marion County, et al.
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Does Ankh-El's common-law name change have to be recognized by the courts and IDOC?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Does Ankh-El's common-law name change, which was executed 2 years prior to his arrest and almost 3 years prior to his imprisonment, have to be recognized by the courts and IDOC? A. Ankh-El has a common-law right to change his name from “Wendell Brown” to “Menes Ankh-E]l’. B. The trial-court violated Ankh-El's rights to procedural due process by changing the abstract of judgment to imprison him as “Wendell Brown”. C. The Defendants violated the 1st Amendment and Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-1 and § 2000cc-1 by denying Ankh-E]l's legal and personal mail, because his name change reflects his religious beliefs and was done prior to his imprisonment. II.Can IDOC force Ankh-E] to sign a signature that is not his? A. Ankh-E] has the right to make his signature whatever he wants it to be? B. The Defendants' refusal to accept Ankh-El's signature is a violation of the 1st Amendment's protection of freedom of speech and Title 42 USCS §§ 2000bb et seq and 2000cc et seq. 2 Of 19